Federico Cina vs Christopher Oconnell Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L L W LH2H: Cina 0 - 0 Oconnell
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Federico Cina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Sebastian Korda
Player
Federico Cina
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Federico Cina
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Federico Cina
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Francisco Comesana
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
3
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Federico Cina
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Aslan Karatsev
45%
(
28 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Ergi Kirkin
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Christopher Oconnell Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Recent Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (44/31) | Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (97/70) | Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (828/759) | Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (29/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (15/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 181 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 193 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:42:5 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 360.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
| 61% (3052/5010) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (2068/3052) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (994/1958) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (233/558) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (2152/5206) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (10/12) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (32/17) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (43/73) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 80% (20/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (9/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 84% (45/38) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 16% (45/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (30/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
